Follow this section to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW? Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens. Follow this tag to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW?

Bryan Johnson, the biohacking and longevity guru, reveals he has autoimmune gastritis, a condition attacking his stomach's parietal cells and causing B12 and iron deficiency.

For training-data-based model risk prediction, $K$-fold cross-validation~(CV) is widely used to mitigate the well-known over-optimism of the empirical risk and is often regarded as reliable. However, for binary classification via empirical risk minimization, our numerical studies reveal a surprising phenomenon: $K$-fold CV may perform poorly in estimating class-specific risks, even worse than the empirical estimator. We perform a higher-order asymptotic analysis showing that $K$-fold CV may converge at a slower rate, whereas the empirical estimator exhibits a second-order asymptotic bias that explains its over-optimism. These findings motivate a novel two-step procedure for model risk prediction, termed cross-audit projection (CAP). The cross-audit step adopts the same resampling scheme as $K$-fold CV to estimate over-optimism in subsamples, while the asymptotic-theory-informed projection step adjusts for the reduced sample size in bias correction of the empirical risk. The resulting CAP estimator is first-order asymptotically equivalent to the empirical risk while achieving second-order asymptotic unbiasedness. An accompanying inference procedure is also developed. Simulation studies support theoretical advantages of CAP and demonstrate favorable finite-sample performance. An application to breast cancer detection further illustrates the proposed method.

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning (ML) paradigm with collaboration among multiple clients without sharing data. FL is challenging under data heterogeneity and partial client participation. Learning sparse models is useful for communication and computational efficiency in FL, but it is especially difficult in the small-sample high-dimensional regime (d >> N) where optimization can yield parameter configurations that fail to generalize to unseen test data. While magnitude-based pruning doesn't account for uncertainty exploration in the parameter space, a formulation with probabilistic gates and an L0 constraint allows sampling from competing sparse configurations during training. In this work, we study entropy regularization of gate distributions as a mechanism to maintain uncertainty in sparse federated optimization by preventing early commitment to sparse support. We examine its impact under data heterogeneity, client participation heterogeneity, and sparsity. Experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks show consistent improvements over federated iterative hard thresholding (Fed-IHT) and pruning after dense federated averaging (FedAvg) training, both in statistical performance on test data and in sparsity recovery accuracy.

Most existing multitask learning approaches are limited by their reliance on task-specific loss functions tailored to the scale and type of each outcome. When outcomes differ across tasks, these losses are generally not directly comparable, which makes it difficult to formulate a unified objective and may limit information sharing across tasks. We propose a multitask transformation framework in which task-specific responses may differ through unknown monotone transformations. Motivated by high-dimensional biological applications in which the predictor dimension may diverge with the sample size while only a common subset of predictors is informative, we consider shared sparsity across tasks. Under this framework, we estimate the target functions and identify important predictors by optimizing a smoothed rank-based criterion with a group-Lasso penalty, implemented through a multitask deep neural network with a shared first layer. We establish the nonasymptotic excess-risk bounds, and variable-selection consistency for the proposed estimator. Simulation studies show that the proposed method achieves competitive prediction and variable-selection performance compared with competing approaches. Analyses of gene-expression studies with continuous, binary, and mixed outcomes further illustrate that the proposed method improves prediction and identifies biologically meaningful shared predictors.

Things to Do in L.A. Tap to enable a layout that focuses on the article. I'm not sure I want to be around that long Mel Brooks, shown in January, celebrated his 100th birthday this week. This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here . See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search.

Modern multivariate regression problems involve several related outcomes whose regression effects are not only nonlinear, heterogeneous, and outcome-specific, but also where the residual dependence among outcomes is scientifically meaningful. Existing multivariate Bayesian tree-based methods typically address only part of this problem: some impose substantial sharing of tree architecture across outcomes, which is overly restrictive when responses depend on distinct predictors or effect modifiers, while others accommodate residual dependence but retain simpler mean structures. This paper develops multiVCBART, a multivariate varying-coefficient Bayesian additive regression tree framework that jointly models flexible outcome-specific coefficient surfaces and a sparse residual precision matrix. Each entry of the coefficient matrix $B(x)$ is represented by an independent BART ensemble, allowing predictor effects to vary nonlinearly with modifiers $x$ across outcomes, while a Graphical Horseshoe prior on the precision matrix $Ω$ captures parsimonious residual conditional dependence. To permit efficient computation, we introduce a sampler that reduces the multivariate Gaussian likelihood to a sequence of scalar pseudo-response updates, decoupling the tree backfitting from the Graphical Horseshoe step. Theoretically, we establish the first posterior contraction rates for a multivariate BART model with jointly estimated residual dependence, proving near-minimax adaptation to underlying smoothness and structural sparsity. Empirically, multiVCBART outperforms existing multivariate tree models and Bayesian SUR competitors on sparse, high-dimensional datasets. Finally, in a re-analysis of the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer dataset, our method identifies distinct biomarker signals and recovers a coherent residual pharmacologic network.

The movement to strengthen democracy in America is suffering as a surfeit of advocacy groups is crowding an ecosystem of nonprofits, coalitions, and think tanks.

Synthetic data augmentation is widely used to mitigate class imbalance, but its theoretical effects on score-based classification remain poorly understood. This paper develops a framework for characterizing when synthetic minority augmentation can improve threshold-integrated and threshold-optimized metrics, including AUROC, AUPRC, best-threshold balanced accuracy, and best-threshold \(\F_1\) score. We separate the effect of augmentation into two components: a change in effective class weighting and a discrepancy between the synthetic and true minority distributions. Under well-specified score models, the raw estimator already targets the likelihood-ratio ordering, which is population-optimal for the metrics considered. Consequently, augmentation cannot provide a fundamental population-level improvement beyond possible finite-sample variance reduction, and may introduce additional bias through synthetic distributional error. We further establish minimax lower bounds showing that the raw estimator already achieves the optimal metric-regret rate in the well-specified regime. Under misspecification, however, augmentation can play a qualitatively different role: by changing the effective class balance, it can alter the restricted-class projection and correct ranking errors induced by the raw imbalanced objective. We provide explicit improvement bounds quantifying the roles of approximation error, finite-sample estimation error, and synthetic distributional error. Simulation studies corroborate the theory, demonstrating limited gains under well-specification and nontrivial but nonmonotone improvements under misspecification.

Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data, but its effectiveness for survival modeling under realistic, heterogeneous conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper presents a systematic, multi-model evaluation of federated survival analysis on a cross-institutional breast cancer cohort with naturally heterogeneous distributed clients. Three representative survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training, and three federated optimization strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, and FedAdam) are assessed for the gradient-based models. Results show that FL consistently outperforms local training and approaches, and occasionally exceeds, centralized performance, while RSF offers the best overall balance of discrimination, calibration, and robustness across heterogeneous clients. We further find that performance depends on the diversity of client distributions, and that FedAvg and FedProx are stronger and more stable than FedAdam. Based on these findings, we derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices for federated survival modeling in healthcare.